A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Jain, Samta
- Relevance of MasLows Theory in the Modern Day Middle and Top Management
Authors
1 IBS Mumbai, IN
2 J.N.V University Jodhpur, IN
Source
SFIMAR Research Review, Vol 7, No 1 (2012), Pagination: 3-6Abstract
The paper attempts to study the relevance af Maslaw's Need Hierarchy in modern organizations for both middle and top level management. It is based on ffie fact that a behavior arouses out of a direction given by motivation. Motives are the foundation of human behavior. In the current day context, motives of the individuals ore also influenced by the social and demographic conditions.Still we find that Mas/ow's Need Hierarchy is applicable and can be utilized for deriving the Appraisal methods and train ing for the executives at different levels in the organization.
- Do Rewards Motivate or Else : A Study of the Public and Private Sector Employees
Authors
1 Group Head - Team Global Logistics Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, IN
2 Clinical Psychologist, Mumbai, IN
Source
SFIMAR Research Review, Vol 14, No 2 (2019), Pagination: 35-42Abstract
‘In an organization Rewards can help create the right employee - management team environment. Also create an atmosphere that is encouraging and favorable to achieving the contributions and efforts an organization need. But sometimes, same rewards and recognition when awarded to the employees who give finishing touch in his/her job, creates an environment of chaos among employees who really worked very hard.
It is through the organization's reward system that good employees are attracted to the organization; they decide to stay within the organization and then consciously decide to perform well. Employees perform at the level at which the organization rewards them. People continue to do what they have been rewarded for doing. This is a form of positive reinforcement. Yet managers must know what rewards mean the most to which employees in order to be the most effective. This study aims at studying the pros and cons of rewards when not given to the right person. A detailed knowledge of the topic is gained by secondary research backed by primary data.
Keywords
Monetary Rewards, Non-Monetary Rewards, Recognition.References
- Adams, J. Stacey (1963), "Toward an understanding of inequity", Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 67, pp. 422-436.
- Bandura, A. (1969). Principles of Behavior Modification. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
- Bruner, J. and Taguiri, R. (1954). Person Perception. In G. Lindzey (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology (Volume 2), Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
- Brunstein, J. C., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). Effects of failure on subsequent performance: The importance of self-defining goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 395-407.
- Byrne, D. and Clore, G. L. (1970) A reinforcement model of evaluative processes, Personality: An International Journal 1, 103-28.
- Deci, E. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.
- Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
- Solomon, R. L., & Corbit, J. D. (1974). An opponentprocess theory of motivation: I. Temporal dynamics of affect. Psychological Review, 81, 119-145.
- Solomon, R.L. (1980). The Opponent-Process Theory of Acquired Motivation: The Costs. of Pleasure and the Benefits of Pain, American Psychologist, 35, 691-712.
- Walster, E. Walster, G.W. and Berscheid, E. (1978) Equity: Theory and research, Boston: Allyn and Bacon Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of emotion and motivation, New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Zajonc, B. (1971). "The Concepts of Balance, Congruity, and Dissonance," in P. Suedfeld, ed. Attitude Change, Chicago,Ill: Aldine, Atherton, Inc.
- www.absolutehrsolutions.
- www.chrmglobal.com
- www.citehr.com
- www.ebscohost.com
- www.findarticles.com
- www.humancapitalinstitute.com
- www.indianmba.com
- www.lchra.net
- www.saycorporativo.com